I'm a licensed clinical social worker with 15 years of experience at the intersection of cognitive science, affective neuroscience, and clinical practice. My work is grounded in the conviction that emotional suffering is often the result of a mismatch between what the nervous system is actually doing and the language we have to describe it — and that closing that gap requires a framework that reaches all the way down to where the signal actually lives.
I trained at UPenn's Graduate School of Social Policy and Practice and Cornell University, where I studied human development with a concentration in cognitive science, including coursework in neuroscience, emotion, language acquisition, and philosophy of mind. That foundation — combining developmental science with clinical training — shapes everything I do.
My clinical background includes 8 years at the Caron Foundation, where I worked with patients and families navigating addiction, trauma, and family systems, and where I developed and delivered health education nationally. I currently maintain a private practice focused on anxiety, OCD, addiction, relationships, and parenting, with particular clinical interest in neurodivergent presentations and the nervous system science underlying emotional regulation.
The Upstream framework emerged from my attempt to build a model that could account for why people understand their patterns perfectly and still can't change them — and what would actually reach the layers where the patterns live.
The Upstream model is a theoretical and clinical framework for understanding how emotional experience is generated, compressed, and maintained across multiple layers of the nervous system. It draws on predictive processing neuroscience, stress physiology, attachment theory, and complexity science to explain why insight alone rarely produces lasting change — and what kinds of interventions can actually reach the layers where patterns live.
The signal isn't the problem. The compression is. Between the body's raw signal and the word we use to describe it, there are nine distinct layers of interpretation — each one filtering, organizing, and compressing the information from below. Most clinical work operates at the top layers. The framework maps the whole stack.
The framework centers on three interlocking ideas. First, that emotional experience is constructed — assembled from bodily signals, learned concepts, action tendencies, and context — not detected. Second, that the system maintains two distinct alarm states (capacity depletion and threat activation) that require different interventions and are frequently confused. Third, that lasting change requires prediction error at the layer where the prior actually lives, not just understanding at the layers above it.
The framework has been developed through clinical practice, theoretical writing, and ongoing engagement with the research literature. It is not a therapy modality — it is a map of the system that any modality is working within, intended to help clinicians and individuals locate where a pattern is living and what kind of intervention could actually reach it.
The framework is presented here in three forms: interactive visualizations that allow exploration of the compression layers and their clinical correlates, short essays that introduce each concept individually, and longer theoretical writing that develops the philosophical foundations. The work is ongoing. New essays and tools are added regularly.